This is what the response and counter-response did: a negative draw

There are hundreds of kilometers between the Negev Desert and Isfahan, but between Tel Aviv and Rafah on the one hand, and between it and southern Lebanon on the other hand, a few kilometers. The Israeli response to the Iranian response was apparently quick, but targeting Isfahan remains like targeting the Negev without actual results on the ground, meaning that these two responses were not at the expected level, at least militarily.

These two responses, whether from the Iranian side or the Israeli side, did not change much of the reality of the current situation on the Gaza and southern fronts. Iran maintains its positions on the crises in the region and on its negotiations with the United States of America, while Israel is continuing with its aggressive plan, whether in Gaza or in southern Lebanon, whose border villages have become similar to the Gaza Strip. The raid on the Negev did not deter Tel Aviv and put it on the brink of extinction, nor did the raid on Isfahan make Tehran an obedient tool in the hands of the Americans, for example. Only Gaza is paying the price. As well as the southern villages. Whoever puts his hand in fire is not like him who puts it in water.

What happened the day before yesterday and a few days before that is nothing but a show of muscle, because everyone who monitors what happened in the Negev and in Isfahan believes that it will not change much in the balance of power and political equations. Today and tomorrow, Iran will remain the first and main supporter of all movements opposed to Israel, starting from Yemen – the Houthis, through the Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq and “Hezbollah” in Lebanon, all the way to the “Hamas” movement in the Gaza Strip. As for Israel, today and tomorrow it remains the enemy that permits everything, and it continues to attack people and stones in Gaza and in southern Lebanon, and it is preparing to invade Rafah on the one hand, and expand its attacks towards Lebanon on the other hand.

While the world is relatively preoccupied with the results on the ground of what was called the theatrical Iranian and Israeli responses, the eye of Tel Aviv remains fixed on Rafah and Lebanon, which are the two weakest links in the regional equations, as many analysts fear that things will tend toward a deterioration of the security situation on the territory. The Rafah front is divided into more than one axis, with the possibility of advancing the “option” of invading it by land, along with what this invasion means for the future of the Palestinians of the Gaza Strip and their inevitable fate, which has been an Israeli goal since the beginning of the widespread war on the Gaza Strip from its north to its south.

As for the southern front, the recent diplomatic messages conveyed to the Lebanese state, with their “warnings” that Israel will launch a large-scale military strike against “Hezbollah” and Lebanon, are not very reassuring, even if “Haret Hreik” places them within the framework of psychological and moral warfare. The Israeli threat against Lebanon, and these threats are nothing but “soap bubbles,” will fade away with the “Islamic Resistance” insisting on continuing its painful military operations against enemy positions in isolation from the new Iranian-Israeli escalation, and that any widespread Israeli aggression will be a great and historic foolishness that will cost the enemy a heavy price.

In the opinion of circles close to “Hezbollah,” the painful strike that targeted “Arab Al-Aramsha” is only a partial sample of what awaits the enemy if it commits any foolishness and expands its aggression against Lebanon, especially since the war leaders in Israel are fully aware of the military capabilities of the “Islamic Resistance.” And what it can do in the future, and that its recent use of missiles equipped with warheads with enormous destructive power is only the beginning, with the damage and terror it has caused among the ranks of the military and the residents of the targeted areas.

However, this does not prevent the Israeli aggression from including all of Lebanon, from its south and Bekaa to its mountains and north. This was the focus of the Elysee Palace talks between the French President and Prime Minister Najib Mikati.