“America has the decision to assassinate the victory of God!”

On Monday, the official of the resource and border file in Hezbollah, Nawaf Al -Mousawi, confirmed that the party is “conducting an internal investigation” on the security and military events that took place during the Israeli war on Lebanon.

Speaking to the Al -Mayadeen channel, Al -Mousawi indicated that Hezbollah was “suffered severe strikes, but it was not defeated,” stressing that the Resistance Front managed to inflict great losses and achieve achievements, including a Caesarean operation, in which a Hezbollah path managed to reach the house of the Prime Minister of the occupation government, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Al -Mousawi added that Hezbollah is “able to expose the Israeli occupation to new strikes,” on the condition of “compensation for palaces” and resolving “technical and human gaps” that were shown by the war. He also stressed that “palaces and gaps are great” in this field.

Al -Musawi continued, noting that the United States was a “partner in the war on Lebanon”, where it participated at the political and field level and was “the decision -maker” in targeting the martyr Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, explaining that the type of missiles that Nasrallah was targeted “was not present in the Israeli arsenal, and was specially brought to use in this targeting.”

Regarding the intelligence work, Al -Musawi revealed that “the American intelligence act against Hezbollah is equivalent to ten times what the Israeli occupation has been doing since 2000,” stressing that the American intelligence program was “in the service of Israeli interests.”

Al -Mousawi also touched on the assassination of the martyr leader Imad Mughniyah, as he confirmed that Mughniyah was “bombed by Peter and means of communication.”

With regard to technical and human violations in the ranks of the “resistance”, Al -Musawi explained that the specialized agencies in Hezbollah are following investigations related to these issues so far.

He said that the absence of historical figures such as the martyr Mughniyah had a “price”, noting that the Israeli occupation may consider that it has achieved achievements, but that these “achievements” are not the result of “intelligence”, but rather “palaces and inaction” in the ranks of the resistance.

On the Lebanese internal situation, Al -Mousawi stressed that Hezbollah was forced to represent in the current government, considering that this was “obligatory and necessary” to represent the party within the framework of constitutional legitimacy, especially in light of the attempts of some regional countries to “remove it” from the government.

Al -Mousawi added that Hezbollah differs with many Lebanese parties regarding the order of priorities, explaining that the party’s maximum priority is the reconstruction of what the Israeli occupation destroyed during its aggression against Lebanon, and that the party “will not accept the prohibition of reconstruction”, nor will it “pay a political price” for that.

Al -Mousawi also touched on the issue of weapons and the issue of liberation, stressing that Hezbollah calls for “proving the feasibility of offering officials” on “the removal of the Israeli occupation”, considering that the demand to hand over the party’s weapon will be possible only if the land is liberated from the occupation.

With regard to the Israeli occupation of Lebanese territory, Al -Musawi explained that “what remains occupied is not five points, but rather a security belt”, and that “the opportunity is a way for the Lebanese state to provide a testimony for its ability to liberate.”

He stressed that Lebanon should “defend its sovereignty”, whether through the state or “resistance factions”.

As for Syria, Al -Musawi stressed that Hezbollah is “with the unity of Syrian lands” and stresses the necessity of “working with Damascus and transcending the differences”, to avoid any attempts to divide Syria.

In conclusion, Al -Musawi stressed that the priority after liberation will be “defending Lebanon”, and that “the use of weapons to liberate the land is up to the time when the resistance sees that the opportunity is wiped.”