Trump’s bold deals … expansionist ambition or a threat to international stability?

Since assuming the presidency, Trump has sparked a series of controversy over his alleged deals to buy lands not for sale, from the Gaza Strip to Greenland. Although these ideas seem impossible on the surface, Trump insisted on offering them, which sparked different reactions on the international scene.

One of the most prominent attempts of Trump to cast a shadow on the international political scene was the idea of ​​buying Greenland, owned by Denmark.

Trump has publicly declared his desire to buy the strategic island in the Arctic, considering that it represents an opportunity to expand American influence in the region.

Despite the strict reactions from Denmark, which categorically rejected the idea, but the Danish Foreign Minister stated that “Trump will not get Greenland”, but Trump remained Egypt to put the idea, and even in one of his press statements: “I think it will be a big step For the United States. ”

What increases the controversy over this issue is the justifications that Trump made, as it was considered that the purchase of the island is necessary to enhance US national security in the face of Chinese and Russian expansion in the Arctic region, a region that is experiencing increasing competition due to strategic natural resources.

In this context, Tom Harb, Tom Harb, said in his interview with Sky News Arabia on Greenland’s topic: “It is clear that Trump is thinking outside the box … The idea of ​​buying the island is not new, as it was proposed before on several historical occasions, But now, under geopolitical tensions, it becomes more important for the United States. ”

American expansion … a dream or a threat?

Despite Denmark’s official refusal, Trump’s ambitions of Greenland did not stop only. Rather, Trump had also shown interest in including other regions, such as the Gaza Strip, as it had previous statements about the possibility of converting the sector into a “new Rivera”, which sparked a wave of anger in the Arab world.

Perhaps these statements reveal Trump’s desire to change the map of the Middle East to suit his strategic goals, which is added to a series of his movements aimed at expanding the scope of American influence.

Commenting on these aspirations, Tom Harb said that President Trump is seeking to change geopolitical equations in line with his vision. From Gaza to Greenland, he is looking forward to using the American economic and political power to reshape the world for the benefit of the United States.

He added: “Even the idea of ​​annexing Canada, which Trump put forward, is only part of his plan to expand the scope of American control, which reflects his strategy in the face of Chinese and Russian threats.”

International responses to Trump deals

The reactions of Trump’s deals were not limited to governments only, but also included peoples and entire countries. For example, after Trump about his desire to buy Greenland, about 200,000 Danish signed a satirical petition calling for a acquisition of California. This position was widely sympathetic to Danish citizens, who considered Trump’s statements as a ridiculous joke.

On the other hand, US allies have not been delayed in expressing their concern about these policies. Where the British Telegraph indicated that the NATO countries may have to send forces to Greenland in the event of continued American threats.

The newspaper said that some alliance countries started holding unofficial meetings to discuss response options, including the application of Article Five of the NATO treaty, which provides for joint defense if any member was attacked.

Extending influence or strategic threats?

Trump’s policy is based on the idea of ​​expanding American influence in vital areas on the economic and military levels. While some see that these policies fall within the framework of US national security, others see excessive ambitions that may lead to an escalation of tensions with the United States’ allies and increase the severity of international conflicts.

According to war, Trump “tends to impose himself as a change in the rules of the game, and shows a desire to move stagnant water in international politics. But in the end, he cannot achieve everything he aspires to. ”

A war added that Trump may not get all the lands he wants, but his strategy to create a dialogue with European allies may lead to long -term negotiating agreements, which could achieve partial goals for them.

Trump’s geopolitical policies remain a controversial topic. While some see it a bold step towards strengthening American power, others see it as a threat to international security and stability of relations between major countries. While the United States continues to seek to expand its influence, the world remains in a state of anticipation of what these alleged deals might lead to. (Sky News Arabia)