Iran’s excuses to evade reconstruction

Imad Al -Shaddaq wrote in “Call of the homeland”:

Tehran does not seem enthusiastic to participate in the reconstruction, invokes that the West and some Arab countries refuse to participate in paying funds … This summary that an Iranian diplomat came out was asked about the fate of Iranian aid to Lebanon, and suspended at a promise launched by Iranian Leader Ali Khamenei in one of his speeches during the war.

The Iranian diplomat says that the United States of America, along with Israel and other European and Arab countries, “requires our withdrawal from Lebanon in order to start paying money alone.”

In response to a question about the reason why Tehran did not insist on paying compared to its insistence on continuing to arm Hezbollah, he replies: “We know the methods that we have to adopt to deliver these funds and reconstruction.”

The diplomat is from answering a question related to legal payment mechanisms, and if Tehran is able to adopt it in support of Lebanon’s attempts to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, it is under the weight of these charges and the penalties that prevent it from participating legally in the reconstruction, especially if the expected government adopts the fund’s choice (Fund) for supervision and reconstruction financing by international bodies such as the World Bank.

One of those who know the secrets of international institutions tells the “Call of the homeland” that this fund obtaining money from Iran is almost impossible, especially since Iran has bitter experiences with the World Bank, as it was not able to participate in financing many projects even humanity from them without the approval of the US Treasury, How is the way today to rebuild the incubating environment of Hezbollah, which is classified in Western countries, a terrorist organization?

The Iranian diplomat stops at the issue of Lebanese sovereignty, but not in its positive concept defending, but rather from “I have a share in violating Lebanon’s sovereignty.” Accordingly, he says that there are countries that interfere in the Lebanese affairs and violate its sovereignty in the name of the “five -year committee”, and this is only happening in Lebanon. With this usual diplomatic method, it suggests that it is not possible to talk about Hezbollah and its weapons and legitimacy as long as the sovereignty of Lebanon is penetrated by all parties. That is, why focus on weapons only and neglect other interventions and violations?

This talk does not come from a mirage, but rather that its components indicate more dangerous, related to the rams that have been between the United States and Iran in the region. Accordingly, it is concluded that the relationship between Tehran and Washington is not in the best condition, despite the statements of US President Donald Trump, which is met by an Iranian spinning translated by President Masoud Bouchakian.

The Iranian diplomat refuses to describe the relationship with the “Great Satan” with good, and returns to the wars of the region, blaming its responsibility from Vietnam to the “Flood of Al -Aqsa”, to the country of “Uncle Sam” (the United States) that the origin of the problem sees as a result of its permanent and generous support for Israel.

As for the words of the American President who is on the Tehran district, he sees that Trump has many precedents, including:

1- Exit from the nuclear agreement.

2- The assassination of Qasim Soleimani.

Iranian complaints do not stop at the borders of Lebanon and their connection to rams with the West, but rather to the newly liberated Syria from the yoke of the regime of Bashar al -Assad. The Iranian diplomat rejects the term “fall” of the regime, and he says that the matter took place based on the desire of Bashar al -Assad himself, and our presence in Syria was at the request of Bashar.

Regarding the reopening of the door to dialogue with the new regime in Damascus, he considers that Tehran is in the stage of feeling the pulse to build on the required thing.

It is noteworthy that there are Syrian fears of Tehran’s attempt to destabilize Syria, especially by reopening the lines of communication with ISIS in the Syrian Badia at the eastern border with Iraq.