Is it empty of its content?

Rosana Bou Moncef wrote in the day: The United States’ sponsorship did not prevent an extension of the stopping of hostilities in southern Lebanon until February 18 instead of January 26 as it was scheduled in the original text of the ceasefire agreement, from the emergence of a growing fear of the possibility of Israel remaining in locations or points A certain in southern Lebanon, based on the pretexts it is famous or also from giving Hezbollah the excuses to continue in the resisting area side by side with the exhaustion of the new authority in Lebanon.

Some leaks for external media about the continued crossing of money for the party from Iran through Beirut airport, which has become subject to the authority of the entire Lebanese state in principle, and the care of the Lebanese army, crossing the people by paying them or by paying the party’s supporters to the south and avoiding any collision with them or preventing them, leaving the field of belief The new stage that Lebanon entered with the election of the army commander, General Joseph Aoun, has not started yet, or that there is an exploitation and investment of a vacuum gap provided by the failure to form the first government during his reign after what is restricted to his movement without an executive body yet. The logic in which the political parties between Hezbollah contradicts it does not help to emphasize its continuation and distinguish between the northern and south of the Litani, which has not yet witnessed the completion of the Lebanese army, the land of the land with what it has and in it in a way that completely refutes the pretexts of Israel and its arguments, and the political forces that do not accept this discrimination. The provisions of the ceasefire agreement, which the Shiite duo alone, are evaluated, and President Nabih Berri signed on behalf of the party on his six papers.

There is a care from the United States alongside France for the ceasefire agreement, which makes it responsible for its implementation under the greeting of Iran and the party to return to confirm their influence if the United States evacuates this, knowing that no one guarantees the approach that the new American administration can adopt even if it does not like The return of the war between Lebanon and Israel across the south, and it stressed the way to the part of the party’s return in any way. This was confirmed by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who said a few days ago that the extension fire contributes to achieving a goal for the Lebanese government to be stronger than the party. What reflects the commitment from the Trump administration to implement and follow up the agreement. It is a strong signal from the Trump administration to Iran and the party alike, so that this position implicitly constituted it that the United States can be abandoned. It is believed that the visit of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Washington to meet President Trump and in light of the fact that the Israeli settlers do not return to northern Israel is an incentive for the American militancy in implementing the agreement, least in its stages that allow this and what is in the interest of Israel.

However, the most important factor that can be pressured later is what relates to the requirements of the capabilities and the desire to support Lebanon to implement the restoration of the state’s authority and the exclusive possession of weapons, regardless of the method that Lebanon can be invented for that and which is intended for the Lebanese army to show a strong determination and the ability to not be returned . And a lot of leaks abroad raises doubtful questions, knowing that what Lebanon faces as a political authority and a Lebanese army has never seen it and the new stage is all in challenging and experimenting.