The opposition embarrasses Hezbollah to remove it: No to a national unity government


Michel Nasr wrote in Al-Diyar: Opposition circles agreed that Lebanon has entered a new phase, to rebuild the state and institutions under Arab and international auspices, entitled the Aoun-Peace duo, from outside the system and the ruling political team, with local and external consensus, bringing with it the process of playing with the system and institutions that ended in There is no going back, as everyone must get used to the democratic game and winning and losing, despite her acknowledgment of the difficulty of surrendering to the deep state by giving up its gains and adapting to the new direction, considering Returning to Lebanon, a homeland that brings together all Lebanese components, is the only guarantee for all its people, regardless of their political and sectarian affiliations, hoping that what happened is a summer cloud that has passed.








Speaking specifically about the coup, the circles asked: What coup are the duo talking about? Who turned against whom? Is there a constitutional path for parliamentary consultations, or did the duo conclude agreements with political forces that turned against them when they saw no interest in them? What are the concluded agreements that are being talked about, and do the Lebanese, as well as the fans of the duo, have the right to reveal and announce them?
On the Hezbollah front, it moved along two lines:
The first: where a careful review of the course of events and developments is conducted, to find out the reasons for the success of the white coup. – – Second: Convoys of ongoing communications to reconcile the situation and come up with minimal losses, as those close to March 8 believe that what is required is not to re-tighten the terms of the presidential deal, but rather to confirm and clarify some of its basic points, the mechanism of its implementation, and the real guarantees regarding them, from the regional and international sponsors of the agreement. The first and last decision makers.
A veteran political source believes that Hezbollah was not harmed at the strategic level, even if it lost at the tactical level, due to the duo’s iron grip on the sect and the absence of any valuable leaks, which provides a safety valve for any future movement, whatever its nature. From here, whether the duo decides to participate in The government, through a weighty share, or moving to the opposition, as it has the tools for peaceful movement in the street in terms of the ability to mobilize, and whose first criterion is the funeral of its former Secretary General, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, for it is able to Influencing the course of the political process on the one hand, and even the economic decisions that are taken, as long as he has the card of peaceful objection in the street within the framework of the democratic game.

The source pointed out that the Shiite duo, unlike other political parties, does not have the problem of accumulating popularity for the upcoming parliamentary elections, because its popular environment rallies around it when it senses danger and pressure, even if it is well aware that the next phase of the war against it will be entitled Megacentre, which many parties consider It will lead to changing the Shiite voice.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

please turn off ad blocker