Do Ortigos ask Israel to stop the aggression before negotiations?

It says in “Major General”:

It is clear that what leaked about the results of the visit of the American Deputy Commissioner to the Middle East and Lebanon Morgan Ortigos to Beirut after her meetings with the presidents of the Republic, the parliament, the government and some ministers, that she “expressed softness in the dialogue and an understanding of Lebanon’s highly sensitive and complicated conditions, contrary to what she did on her previous visit and the sharp statements that she made, despite her continuing to present the conditions – on behalf of the entity on behalf of the entity The Israeli – which they see Washington and the entity “are necessary to stop the Israeli attacks and conduct negotiations with the Israeli entity on withdrawing from the occupied sites, liberating the prisoners and arranging the border setting to confirm the ceasefire”, especially in terms of forming joint committees that include diplomats or official politicians.

This is about the official meetings, but in the meetings with some political forces, it was not known whether Ortagus had asked Hezbollah’s weapons to reduce the campaign or escalate to facilitate the task of President Joseph Aoun in arranging the national dialogue on the file of weapons within the dialogue on the national defensive strategy that he intends to hold, which will be clear later through the positions of these forces, although Ortigos called for an acceleration of the issue of weapons and its link On the subject of American and international support for Lebanon in the fields of economics and reconstruction.

Although the American delegate met President Aoun, imitating the “star of David”, the symbol of Zionism in all its religious, political, security and military dimensions, as evidence of highlighting her strong sympathy with the Israeli entity and supporting all its violations in Lebanon, but it seems that mitigating the American dialect by warning and threatening about Lebanon is due to many reasons, except for the understanding of what I heard from the three presidents, highlighted that interest is The American and the Israeli is now focusing on liquidating the war in Gaza by finally destroying it, ending the resistance in it and replacing its administration, and on the Iranian nuclear file, and the economic war that US President Donald Trump ignited against many countries of the world, especially Europe and China. However, this did not prevent the continuation of the Israeli entity “emptying” the continuation of its emotional war against humans and stone in Lebanon, to the point that it recently reached the bombing of each Chi movement by reconstruction or repairing damage until the bombing of the ready -made houses that the municipalities had placed to run the service villages or put the citizens whose aggression destroyed their homes and there is no other place for them to sleep in it.

The question now after these leaks is about “the American understanding of Lebanon’s refusal to form diplomatic committees and admire the idea of ​​shuttle diplomacy between Lebanon and the Israeli entity” to address the tails of war and stabilize the borders, has the American administration stopped its pressure, warnings and threats to Lebanon, which is now hindering the launch of the New Testament and the new government due to the impossibility of achieving these conditions and demands? Does Ortigos – asking and not pressuring – ask the Israeli entity to stop its continuous aggression against Lebanon in preparation for the start of the technical and civil negotiations to address the outstanding issues.

Despite this, there are those who believe that the American administration and the Israeli entity want to break and abolish any force in the hands of Lebanon that can threaten the Israeli entity as in Gaza, even with a bullet, so that the pressures were exerted to prevent the Lebanese army from launching a shot to confront any violation or aggression against Lebanon, although the mechanism of implementing the ceasefire and decision 1701 stipulates the right to self -defense, and all parties have been handed over to the role of the army and the state in this field even a party God, and the pressures focused on Lebanon’s return to the five -year supervision committee on the ceasefire and to adopt the political and diplomatic option, which has been proven that the Israeli occupation does not understand it and does not deal with it except in a way that benefits its interests … How long will Lebanon be patient and any exit it can reach with Ortigos if it adopts shuttle diplomacy?