Washington is convinced that Hezbollah will not easily abandon its weapon

If any international official is asked about the reasons that drive Israel to not adhere to the ceasefire agreement, he would not be able to answer. But if one of the officials in Lebanon was asked about these reasons, the immediate answer would be brought to him without the need to stretch behind the fingers. This answer is at the heart of the reality experienced by the Lebanese, especially the people of the devastating southern villages and the people of the southern suburb of Beirut. Based on this reality, one can conclude that what Israel wants, along with the United States of America, from Lebanon clearly clearly, is to reach the disarmament of Hezbollah and surrender to the army. However, whoever knows the composition of the “party” from the inside asserts that it will not hand over its weapon in this precise and dangerous circumstance, which is lived in the whole region and not Lebanon alone.

The continuous American threats against Iran and the continued bombing of the Houthi -controlled areas in Yemen will not exclude Hezbollah as one of the most important Iranian arms, and it is closest to Israel, with its constant threat to internal stability in it, especially settlements in the Supreme Galilee region, to which its inhabitants are not yet.
In the belief that the American pressure on Lebanon will increase day after day, with the aim of pushing it forward in direct negotiation with Israel in the outstanding and chronic matters between them. However, the official Lebanon will not compromise on any matter related to national sovereignty, and that the position in which the deputy of the American envoy to the Middle East, Morgan Ortigos is a unified position, especially after the positions announced by the President of the Republic, General Joseph Aoun from Paris in his exile, that Hezbollah has any relationship to firing missiles from inside Lebanese territory in the direction of overlooking in northern Israel. It is not hidden that these positions have disturbed the Americans. This is what Ortigos will reach the three presidents.
Despite the Americans’ knowledge of the nature of the internal Lebanese composition and the exact balances based on this fragile and hybrid composition, the American pressure on Lebanon will not stop before its total commitment to what was stated in Resolution 1701 and its relevant decisions, which talk about the inevitability of removing any illegal weapons from the hands of all Lebanese without exception, especially from the hands of Hezbollah. This was included in the front of the ceasefire agreement. This is what the party agreed, which President Nabih Berri delegated to negotiate his name with the Israelis by the Americans.
On the other hand, the current American administration is fully aware that Lebanon is not in the possibility of direct negotiation with Israel, and that it is the last Arab country that may accept “normalization” with an enemy with historical ambitions in Lebanon’s waters and a geographical area that it considers a complement to the security of its north.
And based on this initial position of Lebanon, which will be informed of Ortigos, Israel will continue to violate the ceasefire agreement through a series of attacks it carried out against Hezbollah, claiming that what it is doing is a literal application of what came in the side annexes of this agreement with the American side, which makes Tel Aviv a “guard” of its southern security by launching its hand in the pursuit of any element of the party The southern suburb of Beirut, or even in targeting any warehouse of weapons, based on its successive technology, and its informants even within the “party” environment.
In short, no one denies that the stage in which Lebanon lives is very dangerous, and no one can speculate on the path of things in light of the decisions taken by US President Donald Trump regarding the situation in Lebanon and the region, especially in terms of granting Iran two months to reach an agreement. This “threat” coincided with Tehran with the arrival of the commander of the US Central Command, General Michael Corella, to Israel. It is said that he came to discuss the readiness of Israeli defense systems to confront any possible Iranian response.
On the other hand, many in Lebanon fear that Hezbollah is forced to actively participate in the process of responding to the possible and expected Israeli attack on Iran. This participation would give the enemy direct reasons for expanding its security breaches in a different way from what he previously adopted in his war on Lebanon.