What after the unprecedented argument in the Oval Office?

What the media reported about a talk between President Donald Trump and his deputy JD Verse and between Ukrainian President Vladimir Zellinski in the Oval Office of the White House was not very surprising to the world’s politicians, whether those who support the new American policy currently followed, or whose outlook does not match the “traumatic view” of the way to manage crises crossing the globe along its length and display, and among them as a way The example is not limited to the Russian -Ukrainian war, and the mobile wars in the Middle East, the most important of which is the war launched by Israel in all directions in both the Gaza Strip, and its continued occupation of strategic locations in southern Lebanon, and extending its control over large parts of southern Syria, with the accompanying concern about the fate of the Palestinians of the Strip, and later the fate of the Palestinians in the West Bank after the unparalleled suggestions of this fate The American president has through the “Transformer” operation from the Gaza Strip to the Sinai desert, and from the West Bank to Jordan, with Tel Aviv insisting that it keep its occupation of the southern Lebanese sites with an American cover, and in conjunction with the systematic expansion towards southern Syria.

This unusual approach that President Trump adopts with the Russian -Ukrainian war, and with the war in the Middle East region, and later on the black continent and in Latin America, would re -mix the papers of ancient American alliances in more than one region of the world, especially with the neighboring of the United States of America from its northern borders with Canada, and from its southern -western borders with Mexico, and an extension to the European continent and to Central Asia and from Including the Middle East region, where Israel has expansionary ambitions that belong to its backgrounds and dimensions to the biblical doctrine based on an expansion hypothesis to extend its borders from the sea to the river.

If the common interests of strategic and economic backgrounds between the two presidents of Trump and Russian Vladimir Putin would not have been allowed to report what happened in this meeting between Trump and Zelinski from the conversations that started normal before their spelling escalated in an unprecedented way, which Vans began accusing the Ukrainian president of carrying out “propaganda” tours, and Zilinski replied to his call to his call Ukraine’s visit, which was not welcomed by the US Vice President.
In turn, Trump escalated his speech, saying: “You are gambling to ignite a third world war. Either you conclude an agreement or we will move away, “adding:” You do not behave at all as if you are grateful. This is not a nice behavior. ”

As a result of this tension, Zellinski left early the White House and left the White House without Trump to bid him farewell. The joint press conference, which was scheduled to be held after the meeting, was canceled. It was also reported that the signing of the agreement, which was expected between the two sides on the exploitation of Ukraine resources of minerals.
After the confrontation, Trump accused the Ukrainian president of “not ready for peace”, considering that he is taking advantage of the United States’ involvement in the conflict to achieve an advantage in negotiations with Russia. “President Zellinski is not ready for peace because he believes that our involvement gives him a great advantage,” Trump said on his platform “Truth Suchs”.
He added, “He showed the lack of respect for the United States in its precious oval office. He can return when he is ready for peace. ”
Later, Zellinski said on his official account at X: “Thank you to America, thanks for your support, thanks for this visit. Thank you, President Trump. The Congress and the American people. ”
He added: “Ukraine needs a fair and permanent peace, and we are working on this exactly.”
On the other hand, the international reactions, whether by Russian officials or European officials concerned directly in the war in Ukraine, would escalate and interact, so that it will have a direct impact on the re -drawing of the map of international alliances, especially after Trump withdrew from the climate plan, and wears him from withdrawing from the World Health Organization and “NATO”. Some have gone on to demand the US President to treat Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the same way that the Ukrainian president treated him after he accused him of gambling to ignite a third world war. This accusation applies more to Netanyahu, who strikes the wall of international courses and the decisions of the International Court of Justice, and threatens peace and stability in the Middle East region daily and in a persecuted form.
The concept of peace, as some say, is one, whether in Ukraine or in the Middle East. This fragmented concept of peace cannot be in Ukraine with “oil” and in Tel Aviv with “obesity”.
However, what the oval office has witnessed is a precedent, no one can predict what you can lead to a future in any part of the world where peace appears threatened.