The withdrawal of Israel and reconstruction is impossible without international care

Youssef Fares wrote in Al -central:

In the midst of cautious anticipation of the fate of the ongoing diplomatic endeavors to carry Israel to completely withdraw from the border sites that the government is still occupied, the government began even before the parliamentary confidence in the approach of the reconstruction of villages and areas destroyed by Israel. The initiation of this thorny file has gained great importance in terms of the government’s anticipation, to obtain confidence and start establishing the foundations for the start of reconstruction translation of the pledges of its president, Nawaf Salam, since his assignment. Likewise, in the content of the ministerial statement, that reconstruction is an obligation, not a promise. Also, the government did not link the rush to open this file with the issue of efforts to end the Israeli withdrawal from the sites it occupies in the south, despite the existence of a close link between stability and reassurance that the possibilities of the field deterioration again and the launch of the reconstruction workshop. Nevertheless, the launch of government approaches never reduces the great difficulties in front of Lebanon in mobilizing international support for the reconstruction process from Arab, Gulf and Western countries. As the matter will be the most prominent and largest challenge of the covenant, the government and the main axis of the external tours of the President of the Republic, General Joseph Aoun and later Prime Minister Nawaf Salam after the government won confidence.

Representative Bilal Al -Hashaimi tells Al -Central in the matter that pushing Israel to withdraw from the five points that it is still occupying is not the responsibility of Lebanon alone, but it is an international responsibility, specifically by the United States of America and France, my sponsors, to stop the war and implement Resolution 1701. In addition to the United Nations and the five -year committee responsible for implementation. Note that the liberation of these highlands is very important for Lebanon, its stability and its advancement, and it cuts the way for those demanding the continuation of the resistance and its weapon to carry Israel to leave Lebanon completely. While it is aimed at investing the Lebanese conflict over the weapon of Hezbollah, according to the President of the Republic, General Joseph Aoun, to the Iranian delegation who visited Beirut to participate in the funeral of the Secretary -General, Mr. Hassan Nasrallah, “Lebanon is tired of the wars of others on its land and paid the most expensive price for the Palestinian issue and wants to rebuild its state and live in peace.

As for reconstruction, it is conditional on the party’s disarmament, and before that, Lebanon will not be given one lira, and this is what the party must realize. In addition, there is a kind of American siege imposed on Lebanon and prevents the entry of money from wherever it is from Iran, according to the prevention of its aircraft from coming to Beirut Airport.

He concluded: In front of this scene, it is impossible for Lebanon to rise again without Arab and international care, which was available upon the election of President Aoun and assigning President Nawaf Salam to form the government. This care alone is able to withdraw Israel and restore reconstruction.