Two options in front of the state to stop Israeli violations

Maarouf Al -Daouk wrote in “Major General”: The state’s options after the aggressive Israeli war appear to Lebanon, the destruction it caused, and the lack of accountability and international prosecution against Israel is limited and is currently limited to two options, the first Wide coordinator, to explain and clarify the continuation of the Israeli occupation of some areas of the south, and the damage that Belawi and residents of these areas and all of Lebanon are finally attached.

It is noted that the issue of the continuation of the Israeli occupation of vital areas in the south, after the end of the ceasefire,
It does not constitute a violation of the agreement and the implementation of international resolution No. 1701, but also puts the United States of America, which played a basic role in reaching the aforementioned agreement, and the guarantor of it, in front of its responsibilities, was to move in Israel to take it to commit to implementing the aforementioned decision and withdrawing from Lebanese territory and stopping the violation of the state’s sovereignty, security and stability, All the bombing operations and assassinations that they carry out on Lebanese territory.
It is noted in this regard that the presidents of the Republic, the government, and the foreign minister move directly to the countries concerned, or through the ambassadors who represent them in Lebanon, to explain the Lebanese position, and demand these countries to move quickly, to stop their violations to agree and withdraw from Lebanese territory.
On the other hand, in the face of the Israeli invocation of the presence of centers and weapons of Hezbollah in different locations and centers, to justify the violations of the Israeli forces for the ceasefire agreement, and despite the Lebanese state’s keenness to move quickly to implement international resolution 1701, and put its hand on the centers and bases of the party south of the Litani and other regions in implementation of the aforementioned decision It also requires an initiative and cooperation, between Hezbollah and the Lebanese state, to hand it over The remainder of the weapons centers and warehouses, which have not been declared to this day, to drop all Israeli excuses, avoid targeting these centers and sites by Israel, and endangering the security, stability and safety of Lebanon at risk, and keeping the situation tight, and re -promoting the country, surrounding difficulties and obstacles, in a way that serves the interest of the Israeli enemy At the expense of the Lebanese supreme national interest.