Lebanon today »Hezbollah exaggerates the movement of move south?

Ibrahim Bayram wrote during the day: The popular crawl towards the front towns that are still under the control of the Israeli army is the approach that Hezbollah and its fans have chosen recently, in an effort to restore the image of strength and prestige, and to force the Israeli to evacuate those border towns.









But the question raised is what is the feasibility of this type of movement in front of the predecessor of an enemy that starts from an equation that it has just succeeded in directing a severe field blow to the party? Is the party able to maintain the momentum of this popular movement if speculation is true that the Israeli is determined to extend its survival, as it is after the end of the second deadline specified on February 19?

The party has been behaving on the basis that it succeeded in establishing a two -way equation: The first is that with its fans it has proven that it is not in the possibility of standing idle and miracle despite all the strikes it received, and the second is that it is able to unite the methods of confrontation that affects Israel without weapons, and it is determined to go on Go in what he started.

It is also known that there are internal voices that raised in front of the scene of Sunday in the south, considering that the matter is nothing more than a beast and an adventure in vain, and that the party is looking for a moral victory that compensates for its great loss.
Of course, the party has another point of view expressed by the deputy pictures of Hassan Ezzeddine, as it confirms that the popular uprising on the occupation is finally a spontaneous uprising that proves that the sons of the south are still despite all their surgeries, ready to challenge the occupation even with their bare breasts, to also prove that they are not in the purpose of surrender and acceptance of results Aggression. This means that the Israeli, despite the size of the brutality in a spear, did not succeed in ki’an awareness and made them surrender and accept the occupation.

He adds: We have many aspects, including tactical, including politician, diplomatic and cultural, and its climax, of course, armed resistance, so it is not a decrease or here that the southern villages return to the method of the popular uprising that they practiced in the first months of the Israeli occupation of the south in 1982, which Nabatieh and the battle testifies And dozens of other villages, and in this context, we do not find a difference between the resistance that directs his missile towards an Israeli tank and that southern lady who stood last Sunday in front of the Israeli tank challenging both the two acts translates the adherence to the land and the determination to expel the occupier.
Izz al -Din continues: We must point out that the people crowded at the entrances of their border towns are in the most challenging, stimulus and alert, but they are the environment that is incubating the resistance, which itself lost children, livelihoods and homes and suffered the bitterness of displacement.

In response to the saying that this act was with a brightness without a result, confirming that this movement was the one that forced the enemy to evacuate many of the towns that were prohibited from its residents to return to it, the last of which is Aitron and Al -Taiba.
He concludes that the movement will not stop, as we and the people are on the date of everyone, but every day, and we are all confident that the enemy will find itself forced one day to withdraw.